![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
I hate it when I’m reading along, enjoying myself, and I realize that the writer doesn’t have a story.
What about you? Do you have some tropes to add to the list? Examples of the ones I’ve pointed out? Want to refute my claims?
Fred [Pohl] is working on a second volume of memoirs and I hear he's completed quite a bit of it.
Is Questionable Content strip #1536
Cute![]()
![]()
25 (17.6%)
Creepy![]()
![]()
19 (13.4%)
Both![]()
![]()
78 (54.9%)
Some other option (see comments)![]()
![]()
15 (10.6%)
I would like to complain about this poll![]()
![]()
5 (3.5%)
This is exciting stuff. For one thing, WISE should be able to measure the diameters of more than 100,000 asteroids.
[...]
We can expect WISE to see 450-K brown dwarfs out to a distance of 75 light years, and brown dwarfs as cool as 150-K out as far as ten light years. All eyes may be on Kepler and CoRoT for terrestrial exoplanets, but a nearby brown dwarf would be huge, putting WISE on the front pages.
Arguably the most widely read science fiction of the 1980s, though rarely recognized as such, were the military techno-thrillers that topped the bestseller lists in that decade—novels like those written by Tom Clancy, Stephen Coonts, Dale Brown, Payne Harrison and Ralph Peters. The genre attracted little attention from serious critics in its heyday, and with the decline in its popularity it has received less attention of all kinds. Nonetheless, the place of these novels in a much longer history of such writing, and its connections with the science fiction tradition more broadly, are both well worth a look.
The annotated version of this chapter will be completed after I get off book tour—in November and December, 2009.
—SB
ScienceDaily (Nov. 10, 2009) — Penguins that died 44,000 years ago in Antarctica have provided extraordinary frozen DNA samples that challenge the accuracy of traditional genetic aging measurements, and suggest those approaches have been routinely underestimating the age of many specimens by 200 to 600 percent.